More on labor’s lasting quest for ethical practices: from the Operating Engineers

Printer-friendly version of this pagePrinter-friendly version of this pageSend by emailSend by email

SUBSCRIBE to Union Democracy Review!

James R. Zazzali, a former New Jersey State judge with many other impressive credentials, has been selected by Andy Stern to preside over a mixed committee of eminent citizens and SEIU officials charged with the task of developing a code of ethics cogent enough to discourage SEIU representatives from misappropriating union money. The question is whether it is fair to burden him with so heavy a responsibility, one that could require intense concentration and a heavy investment of time. The problem is that Judge Zazzali is already occupied with his job as a staff member of the International Union of Operating Engineers. Earlier this year, he was hired, or retained, as the IUOE Ethics Officer to enforce its newly strengthened Code of Ethics, which he had drafted. Fulfilling just that responsibility alone could put anyone under an intolerable strain because there is so much to do.

The IUOE Code, according to its International President Vincent J. Giblin, "applies to the International Union, all locals unions, all other subordinate bodies [etc] ...." Giblin himself received $181,900 in salaries from Blue Cross, a union vendor. One would imagine that an urgent task facing an ethics officer would be to decide whether the code covers something like that. And a lot of other annoying matters are probably piling up at the ethics officer's inbox.

IUOE Local 14 in New York City: This crane operators local was accused in federal court of domination by organized crime and has just agreed to oversight by court-appointed monitors for the next five years.

Local 825 in New Jersey: According to Jim Thomas, a retired operating engineer who keeps in touch with members around the country, retired members of the 7,000-member Local 825 had been pressing Giblin for action against corrupt local officers, but without success. But federal authorities were not inactive. In September, former local president Peter Strannemar was sentenced to 27 months in prison for taking bribes and for tax evasion. He and a colluding business raked in $112,000. In October, Kenneth Campbell pleaded guilty of collecting over $250,000 in bribes and of taking other thousands from the union treasury for personal use. New Jersey’s The Star-Ledger reported that he agreed to the government's seizure of $200,000 that had been collected "to finance his bid to be re-elected as the local's business manager." He had also been an IUOE vice president.

Local 150 in Illinois and Indiana: Two local members, Peter and Daniel Pena, are suing in federal court charging that contractors paid $25,000 in bribes to local union representatives to allow the company to underpay them and to cheat various union funds. In September this year, the U.S. Labor Department sued to void the local's 2007 election of officers, charging that both union and employer resources were used to support the incumbent slate. Election-related events fall within the ethics officer's area of responsibility because the ethics code requires the protection of members' democratic rights. Last year, six local members charged that for 15 years, the former business manager had forced the 125 employees of this 20,000-member local to kick back $100 a month into his personal "Christmas Fund."

Local 3 in California: When Dan Doser, former business manager of this 40,000-member local retired in 2004, he took miscellaneous payments ---"severance" and others --- variously estimated as $750,000 or $625,000. The payments triggered a two-year battle in the local over whether the payments were justified and whether they were properly authorized. A 60-page lawyer's report concluded that the objectors were mostly correct, leading to a change in local administration and a local court suit against Doser which dragged out until 2007, when he was ordered to repay $500,760, including interest; he forfeited $925,313 in future pension benefits. These events transpired before Zazzali was appointed, but he might feel it prudent to keep an eye on the local. (Local 3 was a prime suspect in the 1957 McClellan hearings.)

With all that on his desk, Zazzali has to keep his mind on his new SEIU obligations. It would be instructive if he would report on how the IUOE’s new ethical code helped him address some of these ethical problems in that, his own, union.

A new reinforced SEIU ethical practices code would add to the store of codes that are proliferating in the labor movement. As a growth industry, codes came to attention back in 1957 with the now-forgotten AFL-CIO Ethical Practices Code. The UAW, AFSCME, the Laborers and others that don't immediately come to mind have excellent codes. When Brian McLaughlin, then New York City Central Labor Council president, was caught stealing hundreds of thousands of union and others dollars, the council decided to come up with a code of its own. Vincent Giblin writes about his own IUOE code, "Ethical behavior essentially comes down to a matter of common sense." This multitude of codes adorns common sense in party clothes wrapped in holiday ribbons. Not homilies in codes but enforcement. That will be Zazzali’s real challenge.

Share this

Subscribe to Union Democracy Review

(PayPal is the secure payment processor we use -- you do not need to have a PayPal account. Click here to subscribe offline [NEEDS LINK], by phone or mail.) Use this to send a gift subscription, too.

  • One year subscription to Union Democracy Review: $30 (includes 25% discount on AUD's own books and pamphlets; price includes shipping, handling, and local taxes where applicable).

  • International (including Canada): $40 (includes 25% discount on AUD's own books and pamphlets; price includes shipping and handling).

  • Institutional (unions, libraries, schools, organizations): $40 (price includes shipping and handling)

  • AUD publishes two publications for core financial supporters, one for people who contribute $100 or more a year, and another for those brave souls who contribute $1,000 or more.

    • Contribute $100 or more and join our "100+ Club." You’ll receive the 100+ Club News, Union Democracy Review, and the 25% discount on AUD publications.
    • Join the $1,000 a year or more "Clarion Club." You’ll receive the Clarion, the 100+ News, Union Democracy Review, and the 25% discount on AUD publications.
    • Other contributions: Please give what you can to support this website and AUD's work.
  • Bundles: distribute Union Democracy Review at your next union meeting, on the job, after work. You send us $20 and we will send you 20 copies of UDR to hand out as you see fit.